DFF Research Networks | Humanities

The purpose of Research Networks | Humanities is to help strengthening research areas which are geographically and institutionally scattered, and which would benefit highly from the development of international relations.

Independent Research Fund Denmark | Humanities also supports networks which could lead to larger projects or larger interdisciplinary groups of researchers working across institutions, including cultural research institutions and universities. Independent Research Fund Denmark | Humanities only supports broadly based research networks with participation from Danish and foreign research institutions.

The group of applicants must as a minimum consist of two researchers at associate professor/senior researcher level. One of the applicants must be appointed project leader in advance, and thus have the grant responsibility towards Independent Research Fund Denmark | Humanities. Funding is only offered to the establishment of new research Networks.

This instrument is offered only by DFF | Humanities.

Applicant requirements

You must be of at least associate professor/senior researcher level. The leadership of the network may be shared by several parties, but one of the applicants must be appointed project leader in advance, and thus have the grant responsibility towards DFF | Humanities. Funding is only offered to the establishment of new research networks.

Application requirements

The network is expected to have a broad range of participants and must be an open and inclusive forum. The application must account for the concept of the network, state of the art, the research challenges and activities, as well as for the network’s potentially participating research environments. The maximum amount awarded to research networks is DKK 850,000 (excluding overhead), and for a maximum grant time of 3 years. You may apply for funding for organising workshops, conferences and short-duration network stays, etc. As a maximum you may apply for 5 months of scientific/academic salaries to cover network management and scientific assistance. The actual organisation of the network, including the organisation of the academic assignments in the network, must be accounted for.

The project description must not exceed 5 A4 pages (including figures, tables, etc.), but excluding references/bibliography. Please be aware that the appendices overview states which appendices must be attached, and which appendices may be attached.

IRFD assessment and general assessment criteria

In every case, IRFD will assess an application based on whether the project in question benefits Danish research.

In the evaluation of the application, IRFD will take the criteria below into account, of which the project’s quality and the applicant’s qualifications are the two most significant assessment criteria.

IRFD emphasises as part of the evaluation, that the individual criteria should be met to the greatest extent possible. For the individual councils, there will always be a specific overall evaluation, where individual criteria can be met to a greater or lesser extent. Thus, not all criteria will be relevant to all applications. Because of competition between applications, it is not a given that meeting the criteria will result in a grant.

For instruments in this call, IRFD is using the following criteria:

Achieving the objective of the instrument:

Are the described objectives of the instrument sufficiently met?

Scientific quality:

• Does the project description document that the project contains potentialfor scientific progress, innovation and originality (theoretical, methodicaland empirical)?
• Does it display innovative research as opposed to expanding on alreadyongoing research?
• Does the project description document that the project contributes tointernationalisation of Danish research?
• Does the project description contain:
  • a clear and defined research question and objective?
  • a description of state of the art and/or the scientific challenges withinthe project’s research area, and the project’s potential related contribution?
  • consistent and suitable hypotheses?
  • an account of the theoretical and/or methodical foundation, includingan argumentation for the relevance of proposed activities in relation to this foundation?
• If relevant to the project: Is there an argument for the correlationbetween the project’s hypothesis, theory and method?
• If relevant to the project: Is there a sufficient description of the project’sempirical material or data foundation, including any pilot projects and/orany preliminary data?
• If relevant: Is there sufficient synergy between the individual parts of theproject?
• For applications to DFF | Technical and Production Sciences, a further criterion is particularly applicable: Is the project motivated by a desire to solve a specific problem or has the project a clear application perspective?

Applicant’s qualifications:

• Has the applicant documented
  • Scientific qualifications to an extent that is necessary for the project’s completion?
  • Experience of scientific production within the project area to an extent that is necessary for the project’s completion?
  • Qualifications as a research leader to an extent that is necessary for the project’s completion?
• Have the other central project participants documented scientific qualifications to an extent that is necessary for the project’s completion?
• Are relevant local and international researchers contributing, and if relevant, is there sufficient contribution from public institutions or business partners?
• Is there a strategy for the organisation and management of the project, including an account of the division of labour between the researchers involved?
• Are potential PhD students or post-doctoral candidates an integral part of the project, and have a clear function in it?

Feasibility:

• Have sufficient resources been allocated to the project, including the research framework, personnel, and access to necessary facilities and equipment?
• Has a realistic work- and time-frame been presented for the project, which also takes the recruitment of any unnamed participants into account, as well as disseminating project results?
• Does the project description account for the project’s milestones and success criteria, and are these realistic?
• Is there proportionality between the project’s costs and the expected scientific output?
• Is there proportionality between the proposed activities and the proposed budget? Does this include a good correlation between what the requested funding will finance, how the funding will be used, as well as which tasks and people will be financed?
• Are potential ethical aspects satisfactorily highlighted where relevant?
• Publishing and dissemination of results:
• Are the collective considerations for publishing/disseminating/patenting of the project’s results described in a satisfactory manner?
• If relevant: Have the likelihood and plans for patents in the proposed project been accounted for?

Other:

• Do the activities benefit Danish research?
• Does the project/activity include education of researchers in a relevant manner?
• Does the project/activity contribute to improving researcher mobility nationally/internationally and – if relevant – between research institutions/companies?